Re: [Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-14 Thread Greg Nakhimovsky
> Hmm, and can you see "both ends" of tgath_buf and buf (in particular > tgath_but[curr_len - 1] and buf[curr_len-1])? (dbx) p tgath_buf[curr_len - 1] tgath_buf[curr_len-1] = '\0' (dbx) p buf[curr_len-1] dbx: cannot access address 0x9f7f6ff (dbx) p tgath_buf[curr_len - 2] tgath_buf[curr_len-2] =

Re: [Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-14 Thread Greg Nakhimovsky
Peter, Thanks for the hints. > 2 things caught my eye (except that their "R code" is clearly C): The > dbx output doesn't show off[curr_seq], which could actually be the > culprit, (dbx) p off[curr_seq] off[curr_seq] = 0 > and the _memcpy call on the stack looks odd: > > _memcpy(0x0, 0xfdeb

Re: [Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-13 Thread Herve Pages
Hi David, Tai-Wei (David) Lin wrote: > Hi R Developers, > > Greg is helping me with debugging R on Solaris 10 x64. Please let us > know if you have any thoughts or tips that can help us debug this. > > Thanks, > > David > > > > > Using default transfer plist > in vector_io: perm

Re: [Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-13 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Greg Nakhimovsky wrote: > Peter, > > Thanks for the hints. > >> 2 things caught my eye (except that their "R code" is clearly C): The >> dbx output doesn't show off[curr_seq], which could actually be the >> culprit, > > (dbx) p off[curr_seq] > off[curr_seq] = 0 > >> and the _memcpy call on the s

Re: [Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-13 Thread François Pinard
[Peter Dalgaard] >Er, Brian, I think you are misfiring this time. Firing is always misfiring, at least in that it lacks elegance. There are ways to speak without the heat, or otherwise, to merely stay silent. Yet this particular aspect of things improved a lot, lately, on the various R lists.

Re: [Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-13 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > What did the maintainer of this unmentioned contributed package (hdf5) say > when you ask him? > > [Hint: you *have* read the posting guide at > > http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html > > and done as it asks?] > > There is no evidence here that this is anything to

Re: [Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-13 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
What did the maintainer of this unmentioned contributed package (hdf5) say when you ask him? [Hint: you *have* read the posting guide at http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html and done as it asks?] There is no evidence here that this is anything to do with R itself. On Fri, 13 Apr 2007,

[Rd] R on Solaris 10 x64

2007-04-13 Thread Tai-Wei (David) Lin
Hi R Developers, Greg is helping me with debugging R on Solaris 10 x64. Please let us know if you have any thoughts or tips that can help us debug this. Thanks, David Using default transfer plist in vector_io: permuting About to write *** caught segfault *** address e8554000, c