On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 4/23/2007 8:51 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>> Uwe Ligges wrote:
>>> Looks like
>>>make all
>>> does not imply
>>>make recommended
>>> in the RC version of R-2.5.0 ...
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>> Eh? What makes you say that?
>>
>>
>> all: Makefile Makeco
On 4/23/2007 8:51 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Uwe Ligges wrote:
>> Looks like
>>make all
>> does not imply
>>make recommended
>> in the RC version of R-2.5.0 ...
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> __
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mail
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Uwe Ligges wrote:
>> Looks like
>>make all
>> does not imply
>>make recommended
>> in the RC version of R-2.5.0 ...
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> __
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Looks like
> make all
> does not imply
> make recommended
> in the RC version of R-2.5.0 ...
It never did on Windows, seems still to on Unix (I've just tested it
under our Intel compilers, newly updated so they work again on Fedora Core
5).
Brian
-
Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Looks like
>make all
> does not imply
>make recommended
> in the RC version of R-2.5.0 ...
>
> Uwe
>
> __
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
Eh? What makes you say that?
Looks like
make all
does not imply
make recommended
in the RC version of R-2.5.0 ...
Uwe
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel