On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 May 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> >
> >> Paul Roebuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download
> >>>
> >>> Naming inconsistent for guards as well but
What is the `bug' here which you suggest reporting?
We have already established that leading underscores are NOT `illegal',
just reserved and possibly ineffective according to the C99 standard
(although we don't have any evidence of that being followed by an actual
compiler). Given that the sys
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Paul Roebuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download
> >
> > Naming inconsistent for guards as well but that's pedantic.
> > Simple convention:
> > file
> > #ifndef R_FOO_H
> > file
> > #ifndef R_EXT_
