"Henrik Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> intentional I'd say: I did not implement it, but it seems much
>> more logical to keep the previous rule: All *.R files in
>> ./tests/ are run
>> Subdirectories can be useful for organization, notably storing
>> test data. I don't think it's a goo
Hi.
On 8/30/07, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "HenrikB" == Henrik Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:11:17 -0700 writes:
>
> >> From NEWS of R v2.6.0 devel:
> HenrikB> o R CMD check now does a recursive copy on the
> HenrikB> 'tests'
> "HenrikB" == Henrik Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:11:17 -0700 writes:
>> From NEWS of R v2.6.0 devel:
HenrikB> o R CMD check now does a recursive copy on the
HenrikB> 'tests' directory.
HenrikB> However, R CMD check does not run *.R scripts
>From NEWS of R v2.6.0 devel:
o R CMD check now does a recursive copy on the 'tests' directory.
However, R CMD check does not run *.R scripts in such subdirectories
(as I thought/hoped for), only those directly under tests/, This may
or may not be intentional. If true, maybe the above shou
