Thank you Duncan for pointing this out. I did have tried using the
command \out with no success, but I finally manage to do what I want with:
\if{html}{\Sexpr[results=rd,
stage=render]{"out{line\nnewline\n\nother line}"}}
\if{text}{\Sexpr[results=rd,
stage=render]{"out{line\nnewline\n\
On 03/11/2011 10:49 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
On 03/11/2011 16:28, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 10:21 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
>> Thank you Georgi.
>> With the fix \long the output is indeed consistent with the
>> documentation.
>> I think my use of cat() worked by luck as its outp
On 03/11/2011 16:33, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:
Dear Renalud,,
Would a 'results=tex' (html, text) be possible? or 'results=source' that
could be combined with \if{format}{text}?
This may well be a clean approach.
After my previous email, I looked again at the definition of thr \AsIs macro.
Its
On 03/11/2011 16:28, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 03/11/2011 10:21 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
Thank you Georgi.
With the fix \long the output is indeed consistent with the
documentation.
I think my use of cat() worked by luck as its output should not have
been rendered.
Would a 'results=tex' (htm
doch; Renaud Gaujoux; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file
Thank you Georgi.
With the fix \long the output is indeed consistent with the documentation.
I think my use of cat() worked by luck as its output should not have
been rendered.
Would a 'r
On 03/11/2011 10:21 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
Thank you Georgi.
With the fix \long the output is indeed consistent with the documentation.
I think my use of cat() worked by luck as its output should not have
been rendered.
Would a 'results=tex' (html, text) be possible? or 'results=source' that
Manchester email: georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
UK
____________________
From: Duncan Murdoch [murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 November 2011 12:19
To: Renaud Gaujoux
Cc: Georgi Boshnakov; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] R CMD
x: (+44) (0)161 306 3669
Alan Turing Building 1.125
The University of Manchester email: georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
UK
________
From: Duncan Murdoch [murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 November 2011 12:19
To: Renaud Gaujoux
Cc: Georgi Boshnakov; r
Although I use Latex quite a lot, I am not literate in Latex macro
languages (e.g. the definition of AsIs).
Is there (I am sure there is) a reason why a plain verbatim environment
is not used in this case?
On 03/11/2011 14:19, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11-11-03 7:58 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
On 11-11-03 7:58 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
Georgi, I tried with paste() instead of cat(), but I then get the
following in my PDF manual:
[1] "line\nnext line"
i.e. what would be printed in the R console, which is not what I want.
I would like to get something like this in the Latex code:
\begi
Georgi, I tried with paste() instead of cat(), but I then get the
following in my PDF manual:
[1] "line\nnext line"
i.e. what would be printed in the R console, which is not what I want.
I would like to get something like this in the Latex code:
\begin{verbatim}
line
next line
\end{verbatim}
: georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
UK
--
Message: 18
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:22:30 +0200
From: Renaud Gaujoux
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: Renaud Gaujoux ,
"r-devel@r-project.org"
Subject: Re: [Rd] R CMD check an
Getting back to the \Sexpr issue, I tried with R-2.14.0 and I still see
the following issues:
- verbatim multiline is not shown properly on PDF
(\Sexpr[results=verbatim, stage=render]{cat("line\nnext line")})
- verbatim with empty lines breaks PDF generation
(\Sexpr[results=verbatim, stage=ren
Hi Kasper,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 16:55, Kasper Daniel Hansen
wrote:
>
> Martin,
>
> I am pretty sure (but I will probably be proven wrong) that when
> r-announce was created it was stated that every email got sent to both
> r-help and r-devel,
Hmm, I don't believe you. To the contrary, I'd ev
Martin,
I am pretty sure (but I will probably be proven wrong) that when
r-announce was created it was stated that every email got sent to both
r-help and r-devel, and I see I have received emails from r-announce
in the past despite only being subscribed to r-devel and not r-help.
For example, I c
> Thank you very much Duncan, Uwe and Peter. Sorry if I
> missed the announcement, I follow more r-devel than
> r-help, which I find a bit hard to quickly read.
But please --- this concerns every one on R-devel ---
if you do not subscribe to R-help,
then do subscribe to R-announce
Thank you very much Duncan, Uwe and Peter.
Sorry if I missed the announcement, I follow more r-devel than r-help,
which I find a bit hard to quickly read.
Will try now on the 2.14.0.
Renaud
On 31/10/2011 14:28, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
I do not see
On Oct 31, 2011, at 13:23 , Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
> I do not see it on main CRAN home page.
> Do you mean http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz ?
Links need to be updated. Have a look in
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2
>
> On 31/10/2011 14:19, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
I do not see it on main CRAN home page.
No, but see the announcement on R-announce this morning:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-October/294203.html
Things which need human intervention can take some hours: the CRAN
front page and binary
On 31.10.2011 13:23, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
I do not see it on main CRAN home page.
Do you mean http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz ?
Home page is not yet updated, see today's announcement by Peter Dalgaard
who said it is at:
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R
I do not see it on main CRAN home page.
Do you mean http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz ?
On 31/10/2011 14:19, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 31.10.2011 13:13, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
Thank you Duncan.
I tried with:
* using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 r57417)
* using platfo
On 31.10.2011 13:13, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
Thank you Duncan.
I tried with:
* using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 r57417)
* using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
But I still get the errors for verbatim multiline and the strange error
if an error occurs in \Sexpr.
Is your patch in
Thank you Duncan.
I tried with:
* using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 r57417)
* using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
But I still get the errors for verbatim multiline and the strange error
if an error occurs in \Sexpr.
Is your patch included in this version? I will try now with
On 28/10/2011 10:53 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 28/10/2011 10:49 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs in an
> \Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error:
>
> * checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ...
On 28/10/2011 10:49 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
Hi,
another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs in an
\Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error:
* checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ... OK
* checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_
Hi,
another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs in an
\Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error:
* checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ... OK
* checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS) ... OK
* checking examples ... ERROR
Er
26 matches
Mail list logo
