On 11-05-03 12:43 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Hervé Pagès
on Mon, 02 May 2011 11:55:08 -0700 writes:
> Hi, On 11-04-28 07:00 PM, Dario Strbenac wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In my description file, I have an example data package in
>> Suggests: that I've deleted from m
On May 4, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Dario Strbenac wrote:
> Original message
>> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:44:14 +0200
>> From: Martin Maechler
>> Subject: Re: [Rd] R CMD check and Suggests Packages
>> To:
>> Cc: Martin Maechler , Hervé Pagès
&g
Original message
>Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:44:14 +0200
>From: Martin Maechler
>Subject: Re: [Rd] R CMD check and Suggests Packages
>To:
>Cc: Martin Maechler , Hervé Pagès
>,
> export _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false
Curiously, that option isn't f
> Dario Strbenac
> on Wed, 4 May 2011 10:00:07 +1000 writes:
> Hello,
>> If Dario really uses R 2.13.0 (or newer),
>> and he gets the above error message for a package that is not
>> required but only suggested,
>> I think we'd need a clear, ideally simple,
>>
Hello,
>If Dario really uses R 2.13.0 (or newer),
>and he gets the above error message for a package that is not
>required but only suggested,
>I think we'd need a clear, ideally simple,
>reproducible example, here.
I was able to reproduce it. I made a new package with package.skeleton(), then
a
> Hervé Pagès
> on Mon, 02 May 2011 11:55:08 -0700 writes:
> Hi, On 11-04-28 07:00 PM, Dario Strbenac wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In my description file, I have an example data package in
>> Suggests: that I've deleted from my library to test what
>> the user who d
Hi,
On 11-04-28 07:00 PM, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Hello,
In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that I've
deleted from my library to test what the user who doesn't have it will
experience.
However, R CMD check won't even pass my package :
* checking package depend
The intention was more to have another place to make the user aware of a
real-sized data package I made, since the package only comes with trivially
sized data. The help examples and vignette only use the small sized data, and
never the realistic dataset. I suppose it is better just to put a ref
> Maybe also useful to distinguish between package check and INSTALL, where
> during the former the Suggests: package must be present (modulo setting
> additional flags) but in the latter may not be. The Bioconductor build
> system, for instance, would install RepitoolsExamples before running R CM
On 04/29/2011 07:36 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Apr 29, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Hello,
In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that
I've
On Apr 29, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that
>>> I've deleted from my libra
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that
>> I've deleted from my library to test what the user who doesn't have it will
>> experience.
>>
>>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Hello,
In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests:
that I've deleted from my library to test what the user who doesn't
have it will experience.
However, R CMD check won't even pass my package :
* checking package dependenci
Hello,
In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that I've
deleted from my library to test what the user who doesn't have it will
experience.
However, R CMD check won't even pass my package :
* checking package dependencies ... ERROR
Package required but not available
14 matches
Mail list logo
