On 05/10/2011 1:06 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> An automated build (done on winbuilder) will take a few days: people are too
> busy this week.
>
> For the time being, I have put a current Windows installer for R 2.14.0
> alpha at
> ht
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> An automated build (done on winbuilder) will take a few days: people are too
> busy this week.
>
> For the time being, I have put a current Windows installer for R 2.14.0
> alpha at
> http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/RWin/R-2.14.0alpha-win.e
An automated build (done on winbuilder) will take a few days: people
are too busy this week.
For the time being, I have put a current Windows installer for R
2.14.0 alpha at
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/RWin/R-2.14.0alpha-win.exe
I am unlikely to update it often (and I too am busy this week).
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
I suspect that the Windows build system just hasn't caught on to the short time
between 2.13.2 and the start of run-in for 2.14.0. I think the usual logic is
that pre-releases of the next version replace the patch releases of the old one
(by definitio
I suspect that the Windows build system just hasn't caught on to the short time
between 2.13.2 and the start of run-in for 2.14.0. I think the usual logic is
that pre-releases of the next version replace the patch releases of the old one
(by definition, there shouldn't be updates to 2.13.2 anywa
Hello,
This question popped up on the bioc-devel list, I'm forwarding it here.
I know that sources for R-2.14 alpha can be found here:
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/
But the OP (below) is asking about Windows binaries.
Dan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stefan
