On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:05 pm, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >> I think DTL's suggestion would be most useful when putting a lot of code
> >> in a string, where the escapes make the code harder to read. For
> >> example, just about any function using a complicated regular ex
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>> I think DTL's suggestion would be most useful when putting a lot of code
>> in a string, where the escapes make the code harder to read. For
>> example, just about any function using a complicated regular expression.
>>
>
> Also anything using .Tcl(). Quotes in
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 4:58 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 22/05/2007 4:01 PM, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 May 2007 3:52 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> >> On 5/22/2007 1:59 PM, Oleg Sklyar wrote:
> >
> > I second that. My favorite implementation of this is in Tcl, where curly
> > brace
On 22/05/2007 4:01 PM, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 3:52 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 5/22/2007 1:59 PM, Oleg Sklyar wrote:
>>
>> One suggestion that probably doesn't affect your package: It would be
>> even nicer if R incorporated something that Duncan Temple Lang suggest
