Thank you all for these explanations.
Kind regards,
Morgan
On 11 Jun 2017 02:47, "Duncan Murdoch" wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 6:09 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/2017 2:38 PM, Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had a question that might not seem obvious to me.
>>>
>>> I was wondering why the
On 10/06/2017 6:09 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 10/06/2017 2:38 PM, Morgan wrote:
Hi,
I had a question that might not seem obvious to me.
I was wondering why there was no patnership between microsoft the R core
team and eventually other developpers to improve R in one unified version
instead o
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Martyn
Plummer
Sent: 10 June 2017 16:06
To: Duncan Murdoch ; Morgan
<2005.mor...@gmail.com>; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] Question about R developpment
I would describe MRO as a distribution of R, in the same way that Fedora,
Debian
artyn
From: R-devel on behalf of Duncan Murdoch
Sent: 11 June 2017 00:09
To: Morgan; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] Question about R developpment
On 10/06/2017 2:38 PM, Morgan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a question that might not seem obvious to me.
>
> I was wonder
On 10/06/2017 2:38 PM, Morgan wrote:
Hi,
I had a question that might not seem obvious to me.
I was wondering why there was no patnership between microsoft the R core
team and eventually other developpers to improve R in one unified version
instead of having different teams developping their own
https://www.r-consortium.org
-Roy
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Morgan <2005.mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a question that might not seem obvious to me.
>
> I was wondering why there was no patnership between microsoft the R core
> team and eventually other developpers to improv
Hi,
I had a question that might not seem obvious to me.
I was wondering why there was no patnership between microsoft the R core
team and eventually other developpers to improve R in one unified version
instead of having different teams developping their own version of R.
Is it because they don'
