2010/7/2 Uwe Ligges
> Really, given my lack of time and your annoying posts to the lists
> containing misleading information, I probably should stop to care about your
> package at all. There are > 2000 other packages and some more important
> tasks to tackle. Consider the CRAN team would take so
On 02.07.2010 16:10, Dominick Samperi wrote:
2010/6/30 Uwe Ligges
On 30.06.2010 15:44, Dominick Samperi wrote:
Another odd thing about this is that everything worked under Windows 64bit
before the changes were made to serialize the build of packages that
depend on each other.
That's untru
2010/6/30 Uwe Ligges
> On 30.06.2010 15:44, Dominick Samperi wrote:
>
> Another odd thing about this is that everything worked under Windows 64bit
>> before the changes were made to serialize the build of packages that
>> depend on each other.
>>
> That's untrue. I try to serialize some things o
Dominick,
your messages are all in my Inbox, I just have not yet found the time to
look in more detail.
On 30.06.2010 15:44, Dominick Samperi wrote:
The package cxxPack builds without problems at CRAN under all OS's except
Windows 64bit, and in the case of Windows 64bit there is a problem in
The package cxxPack builds without problems at CRAN under all OS's except
Windows 64bit, and in the case of Windows 64bit there is a problem in a
call to dyn.load(). This call happens while processing the package vignette,
and the odd thing about this is that there are several calls to dyn.load()
t
