Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 16/05/2009 10:19 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Sat, 16 May 2009, Martin Maechler wrote: "UweL" == Uwe Ligges on Fri, 15 May 2009 20:48:03 +0200 writes: [.] >> Thank you for clarifying this and once again apologies for stirring you >> up with something that had been

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-18 Thread Peter Ruckdeschel
Dear Brian, Martin, and Uwe, thanks for your explanations; I have already replied to you in another mail; so I would only like to add some points here. On Sat, 16 May 2009, Martin Maechler wrote: > On Sat, 16 May 2009, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>> "UweL" == Uwe Ligges >>> on Fri, 15

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-16 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Martin Maechler wrote: "UweL" == Uwe Ligges on Fri, 15 May 2009 20:48:03 +0200 writes: [.] >> Thank you for clarifying this and once again apologies for stirring you >> up with something that had been fixed in the mean-time already. UweL> For R-

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-16 Thread Martin Maechler
> "UweL" == Uwe Ligges > on Fri, 15 May 2009 20:48:03 +0200 writes: [.] >> Thank you for clarifying this and once again apologies for stirring you >> up with something that had been fixed in the mean-time already. UweL> For R-devel, it is in the svn logs.

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
Peter Ruckdeschel wrote: Prof Brian Ripley schrieb: That version of R-devel is not current, so please update it. I think it might have been in an interval where we tried out verious fixes for building bundles and some of them broke other things. Yes, I really should have updated; in fact the

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-15 Thread Peter Ruckdeschel
Prof Brian Ripley schrieb: > That version of R-devel is not current, so please update it. > I think it might have been in an interval where we tried out > verious fixes for building bundles and some of them broke > other things. Yes, I really should have updated; in fact the error re-disappeared ag

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows / resolved

2009-05-15 Thread Peter Ruckdeschel
Hi Dunchan, thanks for your quick answer. >> Searching the help archives, I found a posting by Uwe Ligges, >>http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.general/64574/ >> saying that >>R CMD INSTALL --build >> was preferable to >>R CMD build --binary >> --- in which respect

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-15 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
That version of R-devel is not current, so please update it. I think it might have been in an interval where we tried out verious fixes for building bundles and some of them broke other things. In general if you use R-devel or R-patched you need to update before reporting any difficulties. '

Re: [Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-15 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 5/15/2009 8:10 AM, Peter Ruckdeschel wrote: Hi, I am having a problem building binary packages for Windows recently. Normally, I use the "Murdoch-Sutherland" tool set, http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ just build source packages by R CMD build and install these with

[Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows

2009-05-15 Thread Peter Ruckdeschel
Hi, I am having a problem building binary packages for Windows recently. Normally, I use the "Murdoch-Sutherland" tool set, http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ just build source packages by R CMD build and install these with R CMD INSTALL But now, for someone without