Thanks Martin.
I wouldn't necessarily fault Ulrich for his subject line - unless you
want to propose a better one... I might fault him for not following up
and checking out the patch that I submitted at his prompting.
I noticed that you committed my patch last Friday, with some welcome
improvemen
>
> on Thu, 13 Sep 2018 23:33:41 -0700 writes:
> Hello Core Team, I sent this patch over a year ago. It
> looks like it was sent in response to another user's
> complaint which echoed some of my own observations about
> problems in the documentation for 'text'. Did a
Hello Core Team,
I sent this patch over a year ago. It looks like it was sent in
response to another user's complaint which echoed some of my own
observations about problems in the documentation for 'text'. Did
anyone have a chance to look it over? I'd like to get it out of my
queue.
Thanks,
Fre
Thanks Ulrich for sharing your experience.
I'm attaching a patch which tries to address the issues you raised.
I agree with you in principle, but I think it makes sense to leave
some details under "Details". However, the descriptions in "Arguments"
should give enough information that a user can g
Hi!
(I'd like to be able to access your bugzilla, BTW)
The documentation for parameter "adj" of text() in R 3.3.3 is hard to
understand (unless you know what it does already):
"adj
one or two values in [0, 1] which specify the x (and optionally y) adjustment
of the labels. On most devices valu
