Hi Jeff,
I'd recommend you name it something you can google easily (ie. that
there are few (or no) hits currently from google). That way it's
really easy to tell people how to find the package/your webpage.
Hadley
On 6/15/06, Jeff Enos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> R-devel,
>
> I'm in the proces
Only personal preferences, although you might argue that the two
naming schemes hints at a package using either S3 or S4 methodology.
Some packages also has a all cap naming scheme like PortfolioSim.
But why not follow part of the R community and choose an
incomprehensible abbreviation like
R-devel,
I'm in the process of choosing a name for a new package. I've already
decided that the name will have two parts, 'portfolio' and 'sim', but
can't decide between 'portfolioSim' and 'portfolio.sim'. Is there any
good reason to choose one over the other?
Thanks in advance,
Jeff
--
Jef
