Re: [Rd] PR#9295

2006-10-16 Thread Daniel Platt
To Daniel Platt/Watson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: [Rd] PR#9295 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I asked a question that might help me track down what changed between > 2.3.1 that did build and the 2.4.0 version that will not build. Some of

Re: [Rd] PR#9295

2006-10-16 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I asked a question that might help me track down what changed between > 2.3.1 that did build and the 2.4.0 version that will not build. Some of > the undefined names the linker was complaining about looked like #define > symbols that were not picked up by configure.

[Rd] PR#9295

2006-10-16 Thread watplatt
I asked a question that might help me track down what changed between 2.3.1 that did build and the 2.4.0 version that will not build. Some of the undefined names the linker was complaining about looked like #define symbols that were not picked up by configure. The first thing I was hoping for