On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for your quick reply and for only indirectly scolding me for
> abusing the RBugs list. :-) However, I do think there is something
> funny in the 2.7.0 docu (or in the code). Things behave as expected and
> explained by you for version 2.6.0
Thank you for your quick reply and for only indirectly scolding me for
abusing the RBugs list. :-) However, I do think there is something
funny in the 2.7.0 docu (or in the code). Things behave as expected and
explained by you for version 2.6.0/2.6.1, but in the development
version 2.7.0 (which I w
