> In regard to "should", I think it is a
> very very bad idea.
>
> The result that someone gets depends on
> whether or not the new package is attached
> in the session. That is a recipe for hours
> (or days) of trying to figure out mysterious
> behavior.
I fully agree. However, there are 2 reas
The key question is:
> So, is there any way to overwrite droplevels.factor and
> droplevels.data.frame from the base package with my functions?
There is "can" and there is "should".
I don't know the answer to "can".
In regard to "should", I think it is a
very very bad idea.
The result that so
Dear all,
I am developing a package, which bundles my most frequently used
functions. One of those is a modified version of droplevels from the
base package (basically, it preserves any contrast function which was
used to create the factor, contrast matrices are not kept, for they
could be wrong i
