el-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf
Of Terry Therneau
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 6:10 AM
To: r-devel@r-project.org; Nathaniel Smith
Subject: Re: [Rd] Rd] Numerics behind splineDesign
On 08/02/2012 05:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
Now I just
ust 02, 2012 6:10 AM
> To: r-devel@r-project.org; Nathaniel Smith
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Rd] Numerics behind splineDesign
>
>
>
> On 08/02/2012 05:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
> > Now I just have to grovel over the R code in ns() and bs() to figure
> > out
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Terry Therneau wrote:
>
>
> On 08/02/2012 05:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
>>
>> Now I just have to grovel over the R code in ns() and bs() to figure
>> out how exactly they pick knots and handle boundary conditions, plus
>> there is some code that I d
On 08/02/2012 05:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
Now I just have to grovel over the R code in ns() and bs() to figure
out how exactly they pick knots and handle boundary conditions, plus
there is some code that I don't understand in ns() that uses qr() to
postprocess the output from
Thanks Peter.
So it was I who was being too "hasty." (heh-heh).*
-- Bert
*Yes, it was bad once. So twice makes it ... what, pathetic?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:17 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 18:03 , Bert Gunter wrote:
>
>> Inline...
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Na
Inline...
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:39 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 15:46 , Bert Gunter wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I would first check the references given in the Help file!.
>>> That
On Aug 1, 2012, at 18:03 , Bert Gunter wrote:
> Inline...
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:39 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 15:46 , Bert Gunter wrote:
>>>
Well, I wo
Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:39 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 15:46 , Bert Gunter wrote:
>
>> Well, I would first check the references given in the Help file!.
>> That's what they're for, no? Hastie's book is likely to more complete
>> on the
On Jul 31, 2012, at 15:46 , Bert Gunter wrote:
> Well, I would first check the references given in the Help file!.
> That's what they're for, no? Hastie's book is likely to more complete
> on the algebra, I think.
>
> You might also be interested in the relevant chapters of Friedman,
> Hastie,
Well, I would first check the references given in the Help file!.
That's what they're for, no? Hastie's book is likely to more complete
on the algebra, I think.
You might also be interested in the relevant chapters of Friedman,
Hastie, et. al "The Elements of Statistical Learning Theory," which
m
... I took the original poster's word for it that there were no
citations in the help files (sorry, that got snipped from my reply
because Gmane was complaining ... " I notice that the help pages for
these functions don't seem to have any citations.") Now that I took
30 seconds to go back and loo
Nathaniel Smith pobox.com> writes:
> I find myself needing to be able to reproduce the spline bases that R
> computes when using ns() and bs() -- but without using R. Before I go
> diving headfirst into the C code in
> ./src/library/splines/src/splines.c, are there any simpler references
> anyone
Hi all,
I find myself needing to be able to reproduce the spline bases that R
computes when using ns() and bs() -- but without using R. Before I go
diving headfirst into the C code in
./src/library/splines/src/splines.c, are there any simpler references
anyone might recommend? I notice that the he
13 matches
Mail list logo
