Re: [Rd] Non-default build options

2012-01-25 Thread Sharpie
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote > >b) having BLAS as a defined interface is wonderful for swapping default > (unaccelerated) BLAS for accelerated BLAS like Atlas, Goto, > OpenBLAS, > MKL, ... Several of these BLAS have in fact been available for > either > Debian or Ubuntu in some f

Re: [Rd] Non-default build options

2012-01-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 January 2012 at 12:33, Ivan Zaigralin wrote: | Hi! I am a current maintainer of the R slackbuild script (for Slackware | GNU/Linux distribution). I received requests from users to build R with | --enable-R-shlib and --enable-BLAS-shlib, so now I am trying to decide | whether to do so by defa

[Rd] Non-default build options

2012-01-25 Thread Ivan Zaigralin
Hi! I am a current maintainer of the R slackbuild script (for Slackware GNU/Linux distribution). I received requests from users to build R with --enable-R-shlib and --enable-BLAS-shlib, so now I am trying to decide whether to do so by default. Is there a downside to building R with either option?