Ah, indeed. I must have run R 2.14.0 with library zoo loaded. Very sorry
for the noise.
Thank you for your patience,
Andrey Paramonov
2013/10/26 Gabor Grothendieck
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, ÐндÑей ÐаÑамонов
>
> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Recently I got report that my
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Андрей Парамонов wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Recently I got report that my package mar1s doesn't pass checks any more on
> R 3.0.2. I started to investigate and found the following difference in
> multivariate time series handling in R 3.0.2 compared to R 2 (I've checked
>
Thank you for your suggestions.
But in minimal example I provided I didn't import any package (incl. zoo).
However the behavior is different. Something in R has changed between
2.14.0 and 3.0.2.
Best wishes,
Andrey Paramonov
2013/10/25 Martyn Plummer
> This has nothing to do with changes in ba
This has nothing to do with changes in base R. It is due to changes in
the dependent packages. These changes mean that when you call lapply it
does not dispatch the right as.list method.
The method you want (as.list.ts) is provided by the zoo package. It
splits a multivariate time series into a li
Hello!
Recently I got report that my package mar1s doesn't pass checks any more on
R 3.0.2. I started to investigate and found the following difference in
multivariate time series handling in R 3.0.2 compared to R 2 (I've checked
on 2.14.0).
Suppose I wish to calculate seasonal component for time