Re: [Rd] Multivariate time series in R 3 vs R 2

2013-10-27 Thread Андрей Парамонов
Ah, indeed. I must have run R 2.14.0 with library zoo loaded. Very sorry for the noise. Thank you for your patience, Andrey Paramonov 2013/10/26 Gabor Grothendieck > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Андрей Парамонов > > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Recently I got report that my

Re: [Rd] Multivariate time series in R 3 vs R 2

2013-10-26 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Андрей Парамонов wrote: > Hello! > > Recently I got report that my package mar1s doesn't pass checks any more on > R 3.0.2. I started to investigate and found the following difference in > multivariate time series handling in R 3.0.2 compared to R 2 (I've checked >

Re: [Rd] Multivariate time series in R 3 vs R 2

2013-10-26 Thread Андрей Парамонов
Thank you for your suggestions. But in minimal example I provided I didn't import any package (incl. zoo). However the behavior is different. Something in R has changed between 2.14.0 and 3.0.2. Best wishes, Andrey Paramonov 2013/10/25 Martyn Plummer > This has nothing to do with changes in ba

Re: [Rd] Multivariate time series in R 3 vs R 2

2013-10-25 Thread Martyn Plummer
This has nothing to do with changes in base R. It is due to changes in the dependent packages. These changes mean that when you call lapply it does not dispatch the right as.list method. The method you want (as.list.ts) is provided by the zoo package. It splits a multivariate time series into a li

[Rd] Multivariate time series in R 3 vs R 2

2013-10-24 Thread Андрей Парамонов
Hello! Recently I got report that my package mar1s doesn't pass checks any more on R 3.0.2. I started to investigate and found the following difference in multivariate time series handling in R 3.0.2 compared to R 2 (I've checked on 2.14.0). Suppose I wish to calculate seasonal component for time