Re: [Rd] Model frame when LHS is cbind (PR#14189)

2010-01-21 Thread Arni Magnusson
Thank you Prof. Ripley, for examining this issue. I have two more questions on this topic, if I may. (1) Truncated column names With your explanations I can see that the problem of missing column names originates in cbind() and the 'deparse.level' bug we have just discovered. I had tried diff

Re: [Rd] Model frame when LHS is cbind (PR#14189)

2010-01-21 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
A few points. 0) This seems a Wishlist item, but it does not say so (see the section on BUGS in the FAQ). 1) A formula does not need to have an lhs, and it is an assumption that the response is the first element of 'variables' (an assumption not made a couple of lines later when 'resp' is us

[Rd] Model frame when LHS is cbind (PR#14189)

2010-01-18 Thread arnima
The model frame shows the response and predictors in a data frame with nicely labelled columns: fm <- lm(wt~qsec+log(hp)+sqrt(disp), data=mtcars) model.frame(fm) # ok When the left hand side consists of more than one response, those response variables still look good, inside a matrix: fm