Re: [Rd] Memory allocator on OS/X

2006-05-19 Thread Jason Foster
> Somehow you managed to miss it, we had a discussion about this > quite recently: > http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-mac%40stat.math.ethz.ch/ > msg00770.html My bad; I focused on the r-devel list and didn't check the SIG. Sorry about the noise. Jason _

Re: [Rd] Memory allocator on OS/X

2006-05-19 Thread Simon Urbanek
Jason, On May 19, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Jason Foster wrote: > A quick scan though the mailing list archives didn't reveal any > reference to this article Somehow you managed to miss it, we had a discussion about this quite recently: http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-mac%40stat.math.ethz.ch/msg00

[Rd] Memory allocator on OS/X

2006-05-19 Thread Jason Foster
A quick scan though the mailing list archives didn't reveal any reference to this article, so here goes: http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2006/05/16/36/ In response to a criticism of OS X, a diligent blogger examined a claim that it was an inherently slow operating system. The ap