> Radford Neal
> on Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:11:33 -0400 writes:
>> > The current R release candidate has a lack of protect bug
>> > (of very long standing)
>>
>> [ but not really reported, right ? ]
> It's "long standing" because it exists in versions of R going
> > The current R release candidate has a lack of protect bug
> > (of very long standing)
>
> [ but not really reported, right ? ]
It's "long standing" because it exists in versions of R going
back many years.
> but the R 3.2.1 release candidate probably really cannot be
> touched no
> Radford Neal
> on Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:24:04 -0400 writes:
> The current R release candidate has a lack of protect bug
> (of very long standing)
[ but not really reported, right ? ]
> with respect to the
> R_print.na_string and R_print.na_string_noquote fields of
The current R release candidate has a lack of protect bug (of very
long standing) with respect to the R_print.na_string and
R_print.na_string_noquote fields of the static R_print structure
declared in Print.h. This shows up very occassionally as incorrect
output from the following lines in reg-tes
