Duncan and others: I was not being careful with my description. This
concerned tests of
version 3.2-8, not yet on CRAN, in which I was trying some size-limiting
measures. My
apologies for not making this clear.
- I feel mild pressure to make the survival package smaller, per CRAN
guide
On 24/10/2020 2:00 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 24 October 2020 at 05:28, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| they are and ignore the warnings about package size. I think that's a
| negotiation you should have with R Core.
s/R Core/CRAN/ ?
Yes, for that part. The other suggestions need R Core agr
On 24 October 2020 at 05:28, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| they are and ignore the warnings about package size. I think that's a
| negotiation you should have with R Core.
s/R Core/CRAN/ ?
Dirk
--
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
__
On 23/10/2020 9:25 p.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote:
I found an issue with the data() command this evening when working on the
survival package.
1. I have a lot of data sets in the package, almost all used in at least one
vignette,
help file, or test. As a space saving measur
I found an issue with the data() command this evening when working on the
survival package.
1. I have a lot of data sets in the package, almost all used in at least one
vignette,
help file, or test. As a space saving measure, I have bundled many of them
together,
i.e., the file data/cancer.r
