> > Is glibc is actually compatible (and/or is gnu libiconv essentially the
> > only path)?
>
> R is built daily on Fedora 21 Linux which uses glibc 2.20 and has been for at
> least
> a decade with that and earlier versions of glibc. No problems with installing
> using glibc have been reported i
On 15/05/2015 01:19, Smith, Virgil wrote:
The R Installation and Administration manual section A.1 states that glibc
should provide a suitable iconv function, but I can't get R's configure script
to accept/validate iconv on a Linux platform I need to support using glibc 2.20.
Is glibc is actua
The R Installation and Administration manual section A.1 states that glibc
should provide a suitable iconv function, but I can't get R's configure script
to accept/validate iconv on a Linux platform I need to support using glibc 2.20.
Is glibc is actually compatible (and/or is gnu libiconv essen
