Thanks for your thoughts, Martin!
It's very easy for 'pictures of code' (unevaluated code chunks in
vignettes) to drift from the actual implementation. So I'd really
encourage your conditional evaluation to be as narrow as possible --
during CRAN or even CRAN fedora checks. Certainly trying to
On 01/22/2018 08:40 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote:
Thanks a lot, Iñaki, this is a perfect solution! I already implemented
it and it works great. I'll wait for 2 more days before I submit the
revised package to CRAN - in order to give others to comment on it.
It's very easy for 'pictures of code'
Thanks a lot, Iñaki, this is a perfect solution! I already implemented
it and it works great. I'll wait for 2 more days before I submit the
revised package to CRAN - in order to give others to comment on it.
Best regards,
Ulrich
On 01/22/2018 10:16 AM, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
Re-sending, since I fo
Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including
r-package-devel too this time, as it seems more appropriate for this list.
El 22 ene. 2018 10:11, "Iñaki Úcar" escribió:
>
>
> El 22 ene. 2018 8:12, "Ulrich Bodenhofer"
> escribió:
>
> Dear colleagues, dear members of the R C
Dear colleagues, dear members of the R Core Team,
This was an issue raised by Prof. Brian Ripley and sent privately to all
developers of CRAN packages that suggest Bioconductor packages (see
original message below). As mentioned in my message enclosed below, it
was easy for me to fix the error
