On 6/5/07, Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:52:51 -0700,
> > Robert Gentleman (RG) wrote:
>
> > Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> >> On 6/4/07, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks good to
This is very nice work and I like it a lot. I think it would be quite
useful for teaching. My only thought was that when I saw 'source' I
was expecting R code, but instead got LaTeX/Noweb. It does seem that
'source' is a little ambiguous here.
-roger
On 6/1/07, Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECT
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:52:51 -0700,
> Robert Gentleman (RG) wrote:
> Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
>> On 6/4/07, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Looks good to me, and certainly something worth being added to R.
On 6/4/07, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I think this is a nice idea (and not very different to somethign I have
> bene playing with), but with lots of CHARSXP changes pending I'd
> like to come back to it next week or so.
>
> Sorry, Deepayan, you've happened to hit a ve
Folks,
I think this is a nice idea (and not very different to somethign I have
bene playing with), but with lots of CHARSXP changes pending I'd
like to come back to it next week or so.
Sorry, Deepayan, you've happened to hit a very busy stage in R
development.
Brian
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Deepa
Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Looks good to me, and certainly something worth being added to R.
>>>
>>> 2 quick (related) comments:
>>>
>>> 1) I am not sure if we want to include links to the Latex-So
On 6/4/07, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Looks good to me, and certainly something worth being added to R.
> >
> > 2 quick (related) comments:
> >
> > 1) I am not sure if we want to include links to the Latex-Sources by
> >default, tho
Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks good to me, and certainly something worth being added to R.
>
> 2 quick (related) comments:
>
> 1) I am not sure if we want to include links to the Latex-Sources by
>default, those might confuse unsuspecting novices a lot. Perhaps
>make t
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:22:18 -0700,
> Deepayan Sarkar (DS) wrote:
> Hi,
> this is tangentially related to the recent discussion on vignettes.
> vignette() currently produces a listing of available vignettes, but
> these are not clickable. Since R has a browseURL() function, it see
Hi,
this is tangentially related to the recent discussion on vignettes.
vignette() currently produces a listing of available vignettes, but
these are not clickable. Since R has a browseURL() function, it seems
natural to have a version that produces HTML with clickable links.
Here's an attempt at
10 matches
Mail list logo
