On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Claudia Beleites
> wrote:
> > On 12/02/2010 10:32 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear all
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dominick Samperi
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The author line of the
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Claudia Beleites wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 10:32 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dominick Samperi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The author line of the latest release of the R package
>>> Rcpp (0.8.9) was revised as follows:
>>>
>>>
On 12/02/2010 10:32 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear all
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
The author line of the latest release of the R package
Rcpp (0.8.9) was revised as follows:
From: "based on code written during 2005 and 2006 by Dominick Samperi"
To: "a small porti
On Dec 2, 2010, at 15:20 , Martyn Plummer wrote:
> Everybody knows that you have an acrimonious relationship with the
> current developers of Rcpp (and if they don't then a cursory look at the
> rcpp-devel archives will confirm this). The issue of the acknowledgment
> that you are complaining ab
Your original question is predicated on the notion that people are
"disseminating misleading information about" you, with this phrase: "a
small portion of the code is based on code written during 2005 and
2006 by Dominick Samperi". While it may be difficult to qualify
contributions to a joint proj
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Joris Meys wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Dominick Samperi
> wrote:
> >
> > Worst yet is having to compete with your own work.
> >
> About which competition are we talking then? I'm sorry, but the vast
> majority of the 7 lines of code of the rcpp a
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
>
> Worst yet is having to compete with your own work.
>
About which competition are we talking then? I'm sorry, but the vast
majority of the 7 lines of code of the rcpp are not your work. And
honestly, I don't know of any package that wo
ct.org]
On Behalf Of Spencer Graves
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:22 AM
To: Martyn Plummer
Cc: r-devel@r-project.org; rcpp-devel
Subject: Re: [Rd] GPL and R Community Policies (Rcpp)
On 12/2/2010 6:20 AM, Martyn Plummer wrote:
> Dear Dominick,
>
> The R community does not have a
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Spencer Graves <
spencer.gra...@structuremonitoring.com> wrote:
> On 12/2/2010 6:20 AM, Martyn Plummer wrote:
>
>> Dear Dominick,
>>
>> The R community does not have a conflict resolution mechanism. We are
>> quite used to disputes that end with one party, usually
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Martyn Plummer wrote:
> Dear Dominick,
>
> The R community does not have a conflict resolution mechanism. We are
> quite used to disputes that end with one party, usually a recognized
> authority, saying "No, you are objectively, verifiably wrong". We
> cannot,
On 12/2/2010 6:20 AM, Martyn Plummer wrote:
Dear Dominick,
The R community does not have a conflict resolution mechanism. We are
quite used to disputes that end with one party, usually a recognized
authority, saying "No, you are objectively, verifiably wrong". We
cannot, as a group, deal with
Dear Dominick,
The R community does not have a conflict resolution mechanism. We are
quite used to disputes that end with one party, usually a recognized
authority, saying "No, you are objectively, verifiably wrong". We
cannot, as a group, deal with anything else.
Everybody knows that you have
Dear all
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> The author line of the latest release of the R package
> Rcpp (0.8.9) was revised as follows:
>
> From: "based on code written during 2005 and 2006 by Dominick Samperi"
>
> To: "a small portion of the code is based on code written
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Sean O'Riordain wrote:
> Good morning Dominick,
>
> I don't use the Rcpp package and have only the vaguest notions of its
> history.
>
> One of your requests is that your name might be removed from the project as
> you no longer wish to be associated with it. Howe
Good morning Dominick,
I don't use the Rcpp package and have only the vaguest notions of its
history.
One of your requests is that your name might be removed from the project as
you no longer wish to be associated with it. However, I suspect that it is
simply not legal to remove your copyright n
Dominick,
I don't use the Rcpp package but I have been aware of the changes made to
the package over the years.
I don't see what you are after. I don't consider the mention about
your contribution in the authors section disparaging in ANY way. It seems
reasonable that as the code base gro
This post asks members of the R community, users and developers,
to comment on issues related to the GNU Public License
and R community policies more generally.
The GPL says very little about protecting the the rights of original
contributors by not disseminating misleading information about them
17 matches
Mail list logo
