On 9/9/2010 10:54 AM, William Dunlap wrote:
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Arni Magnusson
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:55 AM
To: r-devel@r-project.org
Cc: Simon Urbanek
Subject: [Rd] Drop single
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Arni Magnusson
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:55 AM
> To: r-devel@r-project.org
> Cc: Simon Urbanek
> Subject: [Rd] Drop single-dimensional array
On 09/08/2010 08:54 PM, Arni Magnusson wrote:
> Hi Simon, thank you for the concise reply.
>
> Do you mean the reported behavior of drop() is not a bug?
>
> It looks like a borderline bug to me (see below), but I'm not the judge of
> that. If this is the intended behavior and serves an actual pu
Hi Simon, thank you for the concise reply.
Do you mean the reported behavior of drop() is not a bug?
It looks like a borderline bug to me (see below), but I'm not the judge of
that. If this is the intended behavior and serves an actual purpose, then
that could be explicitly documented in a \no
