vel-boun...@r-project.org]
> > On Behalf Of Andreas Leha
> > Sent: March-21-13 3:33 PM
> > To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> > Subject: Re: [Rd] Depreciating partial matching
> >
> > Terry Therneau writes:
> >
> > > On 03/21/2013 10:00 AM, Simon Urban
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Andreas Leha
> Sent: March-21-13 3:33 PM
> To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Depreciating partial matching
>
> Terry Therneau writes:
Terry Therneau writes:
> On 03/21/2013 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
I would think that the ability to hit the Tab key to trigger name
>> completion in your R GUI makes partial matching almost useless. The
>> avantage of interactive completion in the GUI is that you immediately
Terry Therneau mayo.edu> writes:
> To summarize: my own interactive mix of emacs/R may be unusual.
> For pure interactive folks completion does most of the work. I
> hadn't tried the newest ESS interactive-within-emacs till today,
> it's slick as well. The number of people howling will be less
On 03/21/2013 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
I would think that the ability to hit the Tab key to trigger name
>> completion in your R GUI makes partial matching almost useless. The
>> avantage of interactive completion in the GUI is that you immediately
>> see the result of the partial matc
On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Terry Therneau wrote:
> Note: My apolgies for the "Subject" in the original post
>
> On 03/21/2013 08:59 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>> Le jeudi 21 mars 2013 à 08:51 -0500, Terry Therneau a écrit :
>>> I am not in favor of the change, which is a choice of rigor o
Note: My apolgies for the "Subject" in the original post
On 03/21/2013 08:59 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Le jeudi 21 mars 2013 à 08:51 -0500, Terry Therneau a écrit :
I am not in favor of the change, which is a choice of rigor over usability.
When I am developing code or functions I agree w
