On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> No, you give rights (to modify and redistribute) via the license to
> everybody, but not the copyright. As a copyright holder you can do anything
> with your original code (re-license it, use commercially etc.) but anyone
> else can only do
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> In practice this issue seldom arises as the whole idea of open source is
> collaborative development, i.e., it explicitly allows others to modify and
> redistribute the code. There is often at least a semi-centralized entity
> that represen
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
Copyright is the right that the author of an original work holds automatically
(unless someone else can claim to own his work - e.g. his employer etc.) under
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Simon Urbanek
> wrote:
> Copyright is the right that the author of an original work holds
> automatically (unless someone else can claim to own his work - e.g. his
> employer etc.) under the Berne Convent
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Guillaume Yziquel <
guillaume.yziq...@citycable.ch> wrote:
> Dominick Samperi a écrit :
>
>
>> Interesting, but what about the situation where a new author adds his name
>> as copyright holder without the
>> consent of the original copyright holder, and with only o
Dominick Samperi a écrit :
Interesting, but what about the situation where a new author adds his name
as copyright holder without the
consent of the original copyright holder, and with only one person making
the decision whether or not this
change is warranted: the new copyright holder? Doesn't
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> Copyright is the right that the author of an original work holds
> automatically (unless someone else can claim to own his work - e.g. his
> employer etc.) under the Berne Convention. The copyright gives only the
> author all rights - inclu
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Bryan McLellan wrote:
My company recently started using a R library from RCRAN that is
licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per the DESCRIPTION file,
but contains no copy of the LGPL notice, or any copyright notice. I've
grown accustomed to paying attention to copyri
On Jan 18, 2010, at 23:06 , Bryan McLellan wrote:
My company recently started using a R library
I suspect you meant R package as R libraries have no DESCRIPTION ...
from RCRAN that is licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per
the DESCRIPTION file, but contains no copy of the LGPL no
My company recently started using a R library from RCRAN that is
licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per the DESCRIPTION file,
but contains no copy of the LGPL notice, or any copyright notice. I've
grown accustomed to paying attention to copyright and licensing as a
Debian package maintain
10 matches
Mail list logo
