Feel free.
-- Bert
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Warnes, Gregory
wrote:
> I'll be glad to add it to the gtools package if it doesn't (immediately) go
> into one of the core packages.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:35 AM, "Bert Gunter" wrote:
>
>> Indeed!
>>
>> -- Bert
>>
I'll be glad to add it to the gtools package if it doesn't (immediately) go
into one of the core packages.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:35 AM, "Bert Gunter" wrote:
> Indeed!
>
> -- Bert
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:59 PM, David Winsemius
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:
Indeed!
-- Bert
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:59 PM, David Winsemius wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>
>> Folks:
>>
>> Herein is a suggestion for a little R convenience function mainly to
>> obtain unevaluated ... function arguments. It arose from a query on
>> R-help on h
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
Folks:
Herein is a suggestion for a little R convenience function mainly to
obtain unevaluated ... function arguments. It arose from a query on
R-help on how to get these arguments. The standard (I think) idiom to
do this is via
match.call(expan
Folks:
Herein is a suggestion for a little R convenience function mainly to
obtain unevaluated ... function arguments. It arose from a query on
R-help on how to get these arguments. The standard (I think) idiom to
do this is via
match.call(expand.dots=FALSE)$...
However, Bill Dunlap pointed out
