Re: [Rd] Compiler options for Makefile.win

2009-04-02 Thread cstrato
Dear Gabor, Thank you for your suggestion. I forgot to mention that the build process ended with the following dialog box: Runtime Error! Program: c:\Programme\R\R-2.9.0alpha\bin\Rterm.exe R6034 An application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library incorrectly. Please contact the

Re: [Rd] Compiler options for Makefile.win

2009-04-02 Thread cstrato
Dear Uwe, My problem is that this is the only mailing list I know where to ask this question, since this problem is definitely related to R. When I compile my source code as stand alone library using NMAKE then both compiler options, /MD and /MT, work fine and I can use the compiled library

Re: [Rd] Compiler options for Makefile.win

2009-04-02 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:31 PM, cstrato wrote: [...] > - - - - - - - - > Created c:\home\Rabbitus\CRAN\xps\chm\xps.chm, 166,306 bytes > Compression decreased file by 442,726 bytes. > ** building package indices ... > ** MD5 sums > * DONE (xps) > * creating vignettes ...Terminating on signal SIGIN

Re: [Rd] Compiler options for Makefile.win

2009-04-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
I fear the number of R users under Windows that make use of a non-gcc compiler and is reading this list is quite close to 0. Hence you will probably have to find it out yourself. Uwe Ligges cstrato wrote: Dear all, For certain reasons I have to compile the source code of my package on

[Rd] Compiler options for Makefile.win

2009-03-29 Thread cstrato
Dear all, For certain reasons I have to compile the source code of my package on Windows XP using Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0, thus I had to create a "Makefile.win". Now I have a question regarding compiler options /MT vs /MD for Makefile.win. The following partial output shows that when bui