I confirm it is fixed in r75946. Thanks.
Iñaki
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 09:27, Tierney, Luke wrote:
>
> Should be fixed in r75946.
>
> Best,
>
> luke
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Tierney, Luke wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reports. Will look into it soon and report back.
> >
> > Luke
> >
> > Sent from my
Should be fixed in r75946.
Best,
luke
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Tierney, Luke wrote:
> Thanks for the reports. Will look into it soon and report back.
>
> Luke
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 3, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
>>
>> For what it's worth this also introduced
>>
>>> df = dat
Thanks for the reports. Will look into it soon and report back.
Luke
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
>
> For what it's worth this also introduced
>
>> df = data.frame(v = package_version("1.2"))
>> rbind(df, df)$v
> [[1]]
> [1] 1 2
>
> [[2]]
For what it's worth this also introduced
> df = data.frame(v = package_version("1.2"))
> rbind(df, df)$v
[[1]]
[1] 1 2
[[2]]
[1] 1 2
instead of
> rbind(df, df)$v
[1] '1.2' '1.2'
which shows up in Travis builds of Bioconductor packages
https://stat.ethz.ch
On 03/01/2019 3:37 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I see this too; by bisection, it seems to have first appeared in r72943.
Sorry, that was a typo. I meant r75943.
Duncan Murdoch
Duncan Murdoch
On 03/01/2019 2:18 p.m., Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Hi,
I found the following issue in r-devel (2019-01-02
I see this too; by bisection, it seems to have first appeared in r72943.
Duncan Murdoch
On 03/01/2019 2:18 p.m., Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Hi,
I found the following issue in r-devel (2019-01-02 r75945):
`foo<-` <- function(x, value) {
bar(x) <- value * x
x
}
`bar<-` <- function(x, value) {
Hi,
I found the following issue in r-devel (2019-01-02 r75945):
`foo<-` <- function(x, value) {
bar(x) <- value * x
x
}
`bar<-` <- function(x, value) {
stopifnot(all(value / x == 1))
x + value
}
`foo<-` <- compiler::cmpfun(`foo<-`)
`bar<-` <- compiler::cmpfun(`bar<-`)
x <- c(2, 2)
foo(
