On May 2, 2013, at 10:17 AM, cgenolin wrote:
> So it IS curently accepted, but may NOT be in the futur. Thanks for your
> answer.
>
> So I guess that using
> --- 8< -
> %1:
> %%%2: Section 1
> %%%3
> ...
> --- 8< -
>
> is correct, isn't it?
>
Yes, that is lega
So it IS curently accepted, but may NOT be in the futur. Thanks for your
answer.
So I guess that using
--- 8< -
%1:
%%%2: Section 1
%%%3
...
--- 8< -
is correct, isn't it?
Christophe
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Comments-in-
On May 2, 2013, at 2:58 AM, cgenolin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not that familiar with the DCF... But R seems to accept # quite easely.
The fact that R currently accepts invalid DCF files is not a guarantee that it
won't be following the standard more closely in the future. What you are doing
is i
Hi,
I am not that familiar with the DCF... But R seems to accept # quite easely.
More precisely:
Before posting my message, I try it on a small package: R CMD check or R CMD
INSTALL did not make any warning or error (whereas they do if I use '#'
alone).
After reading your response, I dig a bit
On May 1, 2013, at 6:01 AM, cgenolin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since R 3.0.0, the '#' does no longuer works for comments.
> But as noticed above, comments can be introduce by 'anyWord:' or
> 'myComment;' or 'toto:'.
>
> Since '#' can be used to name a field, we can also used '#:' or '###:' (or
> eve
Hi all,
Since R 3.0.0, the '#' does no longuer works for comments.
But as noticed above, comments can be introduce by 'anyWord:' or
'myComment;' or 'toto:'.
Since '#' can be used to name a field, we can also used '#:' or '###:' (or
even '%:' for LaTeX's fans).
So '#:' is a new possible way for a
d lines are either empty, the start of a new description, or start
with a space,
a continuation of the previous line.)
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf
Of He
On 06/12/12 19:14, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 06.12.2012 18:22, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
On 07/11/12 11:01, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 07/11/12 09:53, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12-11-07 4:26 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to add comments in the DESCRIPTION file?
l Message-
>>> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org]
>>> On Behalf
>>> Of Hervé Pagès
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:47 PM
>>> To: Duncan Murdoch
>>> Cc: christophe.genol...@u-paris10.fr; r-de
..@r-project.org] On
Behalf
Of Hervé Pagès
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:47 PM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: christophe.genol...@u-paris10.fr; r-devel@r-project.org; Christophe Genolini
Subject: Re: [Rd] Comments in the DESCRIPTION file
On 12/06/2012 03:41 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi,
Would
-boun...@r-project.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Hervé Pagès
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:47 PM
> To: Duncan Murdoch
> Cc: christophe.genol...@u-paris10.fr; r-devel@r-project.org; Christophe
> Genolini
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Comments in the DESCRIPTION file
>
>
&
On 12/06/2012 03:41 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi,
Wouldn't be hard to patch read.dcf() though.
FWIW here's the "comment aware" version of read.dcf() I've been using
for years:
.removeCommentLines <- function(infile=stdin(), outfile=stdout())
{
if (is.character(infile)) {
inf
Hi,
Wouldn't be hard to patch read.dcf() though.
FWIW here's the "comment aware" version of read.dcf() I've been using
for years:
.removeCommentLines <- function(infile=stdin(), outfile=stdout())
{
if (is.character(infile)) {
infile <- file(infile, "r")
on.exit(close(inf
On 06.12.2012 18:22, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
On 07/11/12 11:01, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 07/11/12 09:53, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12-11-07 4:26 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to add comments in the DESCRIPTION file?
The read.dcf function is used to re
On 07/11/12 11:01, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 07/11/12 09:53, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12-11-07 4:26 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to add comments in the DESCRIPTION file?
The read.dcf function is used to read the DESCRIPTION file, and it
doesn't support comments. (
On 07/11/12 09:53, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12-11-07 4:26 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to add comments in the DESCRIPTION file?
The read.dcf function is used to read the DESCRIPTION file, and it
doesn't support comments. (The current Debian control format
descriptio
On 12-11-07 4:26 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to add comments in the DESCRIPTION file?
The read.dcf function is used to read the DESCRIPTION file, and it
doesn't support comments. (The current Debian control format
description does appear to support comments with l
Hi all,
Is it possible to add comments in the DESCRIPTION file?
Sincerely
Christophe
--
Christophe Genolini
Maître de conférences en bio-statistique
Vice président Communication interne et animation du campus
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
