Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2016-09-02 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
Am 02.09.2016 um 16:02 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: On 2 September 2016 at 14:54, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: | Hi, | | I have the same problem and, at a first look, the issues reported by the | CRAN checks seemed easy to fix. However, after checking it again locally | and on http://win-builder.r-proje

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2016-09-02 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 2 September 2016 at 14:54, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: | Hi, | | I have the same problem and, at a first look, the issues reported by the | CRAN checks seemed easy to fix. However, after checking it again locally | and on http://win-builder.r-project.org it appeared that GCC 4.9.3 | (Windows, Rt

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2016-09-02 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
Hi, I have the same problem and, at a first look, the issues reported by the CRAN checks seemed easy to fix. However, after checking it again locally and on http://win-builder.r-project.org it appeared that GCC 4.9.3 (Windows, Rtools 3.4), same also on win-builder reports even more issues, es

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2016-08-28 Thread Roger Koenker
Hi Kurt, I have started to look into this, and I need some guidance about how to prioritize my repairs. There are basically 4 categories of warnings from gfortran’s pedantic critique of my packages: 1. Some errant tab characters it doesn’t like, 2. Too many or too few continue

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Friendly
It is A Good Thing to regularize Authors and Maintainers of packages, particularly for citation() and toBibTex(). Could I add a suggested TODO item for the maintainer of package.skeleton and friends to help reinforce this for new packages: - Please add appropriate templates for Author@R in th

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2007-04-10 Thread Gavin Simpson
Thank you Prof. Ripley for identifying the potential cause of the warnings. From what Kurt says in his email, I can wait a little while and see if the warnings for r-prerel go away in the future. On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 21:58 +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote: > > Prof Brian Ripley writes: > > > I only

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2007-04-10 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Apr 10, 2007, at 3:58 PM, Kurt Hornik wrote: >> Prof Brian Ripley writes: > >> I only see analogue (sic), but is this not related to the >> Encoding: UTF-8 > >> ? Debian is very fond of subdividing packages, and I suspect it is >> the standard glibc UTF-8 locale ("en_US.utf8") that is mis

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2007-04-10 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Prof Brian Ripley writes: > I only see analogue (sic), but is this not related to the > Encoding: UTF-8 > ? Debian is very fond of subdividing packages, and I suspect it is > the standard glibc UTF-8 locale ("en_US.utf8") that is missing. There > is an override for such people, to set R_E

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2007-04-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
I only see analogue (sic), but is this not related to the Encoding: UTF-8 ? Debian is very fond of subdividing packages, and I suspect it is the standard glibc UTF-8 locale ("en_US.utf8") that is missing. There is an override for such people, to set R_ENCODING_LOCALES, and looks like they ha

Re: [Rd] CRAN packages maintained by you

2007-04-10 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 08:40 +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote: > Dear maintainers of CRAN packages, > > This concerns the packages > > And now keep the updates rolling in ... Dear R Developers, I was recently emailed by the CRAN maintainers about warnings for my two packages, analog and cocorresp, that