Sorry Dirk, I don't remember discussing this topic or alternatives with you
at all.
Have a nice day.
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, 14:42 Morgan Morgan, wrote:
> Thanks Jan and Tomas for the feedback.
> Answer from Jan is what I am looking for.
> Maybe I am not looking in the right place buy it is not eas
On 30 June 2020 at 14:42, Morgan Morgan wrote:
| Thanks Jan and Tomas for the feedback.
| Answer from Jan is what I am looking for.
| Maybe I am not looking in the right place buy it is not easy to understand
| how these LCONS, CONS, SETCDR...etc works.
a) There are alternatives, and if memory s
Thanks Jan and Tomas for the feedback.
Answer from Jan is what I am looking for.
Maybe I am not looking in the right place buy it is not easy to understand
how these LCONS, CONS, SETCDR...etc works.
Thank you
Best regards
Morgan
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, 12:36 Tomas Kalibera, wrote:
> On 6/30/20 1
On 6/30/20 1:06 PM, Jan Gorecki wrote:
It is quite known that R documentation on R C api could be improved...
Please see "5.11 Evaluating R expressions from C" from "Writing R
Extensions"
Best
Tomas
Still R-package-devel mailing list should be preferred for this kind
of questions.
Not sure
It is quite known that R documentation on R C api could be improved...
Still R-package-devel mailing list should be preferred for this kind
of questions.
Not sure if that is the best way, but works.
call_to_sum <- inline::cfunction(
language = "C",
sig = c(x = "SEXP"), body = "
SEXP e = PROTE
Hi All,
I was reading the R extension manual section 5.11 ( Evaluating R expression
from C) and I tried to build a simple call to the sum function. Please see
below.
call_to_sum <- inline::cfunction(
language = "C",
sig = c(x = "SEXP"), body = "
SEXP e = PROTECT(lang2(install(\"sum\"), x));
