On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 15:05 -0500, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Matt Shotwell wrote:
>
> > I do keep track of R's bug reports by RSS (Atom actually), but it's a
> > bit more complicated than just copying the `feed' link after following
> > the Show open bugs new-to-old link.
On Dec 24, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Matt Shotwell wrote:
> I do keep track of R's bug reports by RSS (Atom actually), but it's a
> bit more complicated than just copying the `feed' link after following
> the Show open bugs new-to-old link. If you use that feed, you will get
> the earliest 100 entries, s
I do keep track of R's bug reports by RSS (Atom actually), but it's a
bit more complicated than just copying the `feed' link after following
the Show open bugs new-to-old link. If you use that feed, you will get
the earliest 100 entries, starting Jan 28, 2000. I have had good luck
monitoring the mo
On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2010, at 8:24 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
>> On Dec 23, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>>
>>> This message contains a good question:
>>>
>>> Is there any reason why the bug reports are no longer mailed to R-devel?
>>
>> The wa
