Re: [Rd] Buglet in optim() SANN

2009-10-26 Thread Ravi Varadhan
Prof. John C Nash Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 6:34 PM To: Prof Brian Ripley Cc: r-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] Buglet in optim() SANN Indeed Brian is correct about the functioning of SANN and the R documentation. I'd misread the "maxit" warning. Things can stay as t

Re: [Rd] Buglet in optim() SANN

2009-10-25 Thread Prof. John C Nash
Indeed Brian is correct about the functioning of SANN and the R documentation. I'd misread the "maxit" warning. Things can stay as they are for now. The rest of this msg is for information and an invitation to off-list discussion. I realize my posting opens up the can of worms about what "converg

Re: [Rd] Buglet in optim() SANN

2009-10-25 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
As the posting guide says, please read the help carefully before posting. It does say: ‘maxit’ The maximum number of iterations. Defaults to ‘100’ for the derivative-based methods, and ‘500’ for ‘"Nelder-Mead"’. For ‘"SANN"’ ‘maxit’ gives the total number of function

[Rd] Buglet in optim() SANN

2009-10-20 Thread Prof. John C Nash
I think SANN method in optim() is failing to report that it has not converged. Here is an example genrose.f<- function(x, gs=NULL){ # objective function ## One generalization of the Rosenbrock banana valley function (n parameters) n <- length(x) if(is.null(gs)) { gs=100.0 }