I've now tidied up the remaining messages, so there are about 6 new ones
(for now -- spam was still arriving as I did this). For a couple of those
the attachements will need unpicking and decoding.
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Martin Maechler wrote:
"PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAI
Marc Schwartz wrote:
on 08/07/2008 05:23 PM Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Martin Maechler wrote:
"PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:43:50 +0200 writes:
PD> Looks like reports from the last month are trickling
PD> in. 170 of them in incoming, but
on 08/07/2008 05:23 PM Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Martin Maechler wrote:
"PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:43:50 +0200 writes:
PD> Looks like reports from the last month are trickling
PD> in. 170 of them in incoming, but there's a lot of
Martin Maechler wrote:
"PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:43:50 +0200 writes:
PD> Looks like reports from the last month are trickling
PD> in. 170 of them in incoming, but there's a lot of
PD> spam. I hope Martin's spamfilters are less
> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:43:50 +0200 writes:
PD> Looks like reports from the last month are trickling
PD> in. 170 of them in incoming, but there's a lot of
PD> spam. I hope Martin's spamfilters are less leaky that
PD> ours, s
Looks like reports from the last month are trickling in. 170 of them in
incoming, but there's a lot of spam. I hope Martin's spamfilters are
less leaky that ours, so that they get killed en route to r-devel
--
O__ Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- D
