Thanks. It is useful to have a list of items that are outstanding.
I will experiment a bit more, but may revert to using R-2.11.1 for
running Sweave(). Did any of these issues arise for R-2.11.1?
John Maindonald email: john.maindon...@anu.edu.au
phone : +61 2 (6125)3473fax : +61
On 21/12/2010 3:52 PM, John Maindonald wrote:
Thanks. It is useful to have a list of items that are outstanding.
I will experiment a bit more, but may revert to using R-2.11.1 for
running Sweave(). Did any of these issues arise for R-2.11.1?
That's up to you to figure out, but it would be mor
On 21/12/2010 3:23 AM, John Maindonald wrote:
Although the specific behaviour that was reported has been fixed, bugs
remain in Sweave's processing of comment lines when keep.source=TRUE
This is in some senses a follow-up from earlier bugs. Hence the query --
what is the preferred procedure, to
Although the specific behaviour that was reported has been fixed, bugs
remain in Sweave's processing of comment lines when keep.source=TRUE
This is in some senses a follow-up from earlier bugs. Hence the query --
what is the preferred procedure, to submit a new bug report? (Another option
migh
