Hi,
sorry for replying so late to this. I somehow missed the original thread
and was just pointed to it by Yves...
I noticed that there is a (minor) bug either the command all.equal()
or in the "plm" package. I demonstrate this using an example taken
from the documentation of plm():
I'm no
Zeileis
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Bug in all.equal() or in the plm package
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
> > Arne Henningsen wrote:
> >>
> >> I noticed that there is a (minor) bug either the command all.equal()
> >> or
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Arne Henningsen wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that there is a (minor) bug either the command all.equal()
>> or in the "plm" package. I demonstrate this using an example taken
>> from the documentation of plm():
>>
>
> I'm not sure this is a bug, bu
Arne Henningsen wrote:
Hi!
I noticed that there is a (minor) bug either the command all.equal()
or in the "plm" package. I demonstrate this using an example taken
from the documentation of plm():
I'm not sure this is a bug, but I'd call it at least a design flaw. The
problem is that the l
Hi!
I noticed that there is a (minor) bug either the command all.equal()
or in the "plm" package. I demonstrate this using an example taken
from the documentation of plm():
==
R> data("Produc", package="plm")
R> zz <- plm(log(gsp)~log(pcap)+log(pc)+log(emp)+une
