Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11281)

2008-05-12 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Soeren, > > "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 + writes: > > SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am ju

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11456)

2008-05-12 Thread r-ml
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Soeren, > > "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 + writes: > > SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am ju

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11281)

2008-05-12 Thread maechler
Hi Soeren, > "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 + writes: SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am just sending it here >> too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org > i

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11438)

2008-05-10 Thread bugreports
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org > > is not the right place: > > > I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In > R-bugs, there's a filing sy

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11281)

2008-05-10 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org > > is not the right place: > > > I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In > R-bugs, there's a filing sy

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11284)

2008-04-26 Thread p . dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like [EMAIL PROTECTED] g > is not the right place: > =20 I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In=20 R-bugs, there's a filing system so that it won't be completely forgotten.= =2E. However, your

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11281)

2008-04-26 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org > is not the right place: > I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In R-bugs, there's a filing system so that it won't be completely forgotten... However, your mail

[Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11281)

2008-04-25 Thread bugreports
OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org is not the right place: =EF=BB=BFOn Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:48 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > While trying to fix swig & R2.7 I actually discovered that there is a > bug in R 2.7 causing a crash (so R & swig might actually w

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines

2008-04-25 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:48 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > While trying to fix swig & R2.7 I actually discovered that there is a > bug in R 2.7 causing a crash (so R & swig might actually work): > > the bug is in ./src/main/gram.c line 3038: > > } else { /* over-long line */ > fix

[Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines

2008-04-24 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
While trying to fix swig & R2.7 I actually discovered that there is a bug in R 2.7 causing a crash (so R & swig might actually work): the bug is in ./src/main/gram.c line 3038: } else { /* over-long line */ fixthis --> char *LongLine = (char *) malloc(nc); if(!LongLine)