I've committed a fix for 2.3 affecting only "R --version" (don't want to
play with real R output during feature freeze), and a cleaner solution
for 2.4 which gets the startup message and --version even more in
sync.
Passes all checks for me, and the man page looks OK again. Thanks for
spotting th
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:56:27 -0400,
> Duncan Murdoch (DM) wrote:
> On 4/11/2006 7:45 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> R-devel'ers,
>>
>> On 11 April 2006 at 10:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> |
>> | Kanru,
>> |
>> | Thanks for the bugreport.
>> |
>> | On 11 April
On 4/11/2006 7:45 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> R-devel'ers,
>
> On 11 April 2006 at 10:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | Kanru,
> |
> | Thanks for the bugreport.
> |
> | On 11 April 2006 at 22:03, Kanru Chen wrote:
> | | Package: r-base-core
> | | Version: 2.2.1.svn37668-1
> | | Severity:
R-devel'ers,
On 11 April 2006 at 10:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Kanru,
|
| Thanks for the bugreport.
|
| On 11 April 2006 at 22:03, Kanru Chen wrote:
| | Package: r-base-core
| | Version: 2.2.1.svn37668-1
| | Severity: minor
| |
| | In manpage of /usr/bin/R, the first, fourth and last l
Kanru,
Thanks for the bugreport.
On 11 April 2006 at 22:03, Kanru Chen wrote:
| Package: r-base-core
| Version: 2.2.1.svn37668-1
| Severity: minor
|
| In manpage of /usr/bin/R, the first, fourth and last line shows `VERSION'
| instead of `R'.
|
| I believe it is a typo.
More likely something i
