On 9/26/2005 10:29 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> After foo<-list(), foo$bar is NULL, so we can simplify this.
>>
>> Here's a simpler version:
>>
>> # These work, which is a bit of a surprise, but there is some
>> inconsistency: one x becomes a lis
On 9/26/2005 10:29 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> After foo<-list(), foo$bar is NULL, so we can simplify this.
>>
>> Here's a simpler version:
>>
>> # These work, which is a bit of a surprise, but there is some
>> inconsistency: one x becomes a lis
Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After foo<-list(), foo$bar is NULL, so we can simplify this.
>
> Here's a simpler version:
>
> # These work, which is a bit of a surprise, but there is some
> inconsistency: one x becomes a list, the other is numeric:
> > x <- NULL
> > x[[1]] <-
Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After foo<-list(), foo$bar is NULL, so we can simplify this.
>
> Here's a simpler version:
>
> # These work, which is a bit of a surprise, but there is some
> inconsistency: one x becomes a list, the other is numeric:
> > x <- NULL
> > x[[1]] <-
On 9/26/2005 7:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Jussi Jousimo
> Version: 2.2.0 beta
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (193.167.195.60)
>
>
> I'm trying to assign a zero length vector to a list:
>
> x<-numeric()
> length(x)
> foo<-list()
> foo$bar[[1]]<-x
> length(foo$bar[[1]
Full_Name: Jussi Jousimo
Version: 2.2.0 beta
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (193.167.195.60)
I'm trying to assign a zero length vector to a list:
x<-numeric()
length(x)
foo<-list()
foo$bar[[1]]<-x
length(foo$bar[[1]])
foo
But in the list this vector turns out to be length one with rando
