Re: [Rd] An interesting chat with ChatGPT

2023-02-17 Thread Robert Baer
On 2/13/2023 11:14 AM, Kevin Coombes wrote: Chat bots are like politicians, or talking dogs. The fact that they exist is interesting. But no same person would believe anything they say. I think it is more appropriate to be a little less harsh, " no same person would believe EVERYTHING they say

Re: [Rd] An interesting chat with ChatGPT

2023-02-16 Thread Ravi Varadhan via R-devel
:54 AM To: Duncan Murdoch Cc: r-devel Subject: Re: [Rd] An interesting chat with ChatGPT External Email - Use Caution Duncan - Indeed, this has now been well documented; I have called these constructions "Schr�dinger Facts", since they arise from a superposition of tru

Re: [Rd] An interesting chat with ChatGPT

2023-02-13 Thread Kevin Coombes
Chat bots are like politicians, or talking dogs. The fact that they exist is interesting. But no same person would believe anything they say. On Mon, Feb 13, 2023, 10:58 AM Boris Steipe wrote: > Duncan - > > Indeed, this has now been well documented; I have called these > constructions "Schrödin

Re: [Rd] An interesting chat with ChatGPT

2023-02-13 Thread Boris Steipe
Duncan - Indeed, this has now been well documented; I have called these constructions "Schrödinger Facts", since they arise from a superposition of truths in the training data that collapse into an untruth when observed. https://sentientsyllabus.substack.com/p/chatgpts-achilles-heel Now, th

[Rd] An interesting chat with ChatGPT

2023-02-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch
I was wondering which anchor would match in the regular expression "(a)|(b)" if both "a" and "b" matches the target string. What appears to happen is that the first match wins, and that's how it is documented in Python, but I was looking for docs on this in R. As far as I can see, the ?regex