Re: [Rd] About ParallelR and licensing of packages

2009-04-26 Thread David M Smith
I rather feel that this discussion has gone beyond a topic and tone suitable for r-devel. I would like to say however, as an author of several GPL works myself, that I am confident that REvolution Computing (my employer, in case that's not clear) is a good-faith member of the open-source community

Re: [Rd] About ParallelR and licensing of packages

2009-04-26 Thread Fellows, Ian
but that is not up to you or your lawyers. That is between the FSF and her. Ian From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Dowle [mdo...@mdowle.plus.com] Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 7:21 PM To: Danese Coop

Re: [Rd] About ParallelR and licensing of packages

2009-04-26 Thread Matthew Dowle
Dear Danese, Without prejudice save as to costs I am the author of the R library "data.table". I released data.table under the provisions of the General Public License (GPL). This email is to notify REvolution that we may be in dispute. If we are in dispute then I am entitled to issue litigat

[Rd] About ParallelR and licensing of packages

2009-04-24 Thread Danese Cooper
Howdy all... Reading with interest the thread(s) about REvolution, package licensing and the requirements of the GPL. First of all, let me introduce myself .  I joined REvolution Computing in February, after working for nearly 4 years for Intel as an open source strategist and before that for 6 ye