Duncan Murdoch-2 wrote:
>
> On 11/22/2007 10:11 AM, Ulrike Grömping wrote:
> > Hi Duncan,
> >
> > yes, I am talking about a new version (currently called 1.99, to be
> made 2.0 on release). I don't think I should attach the file in a note
> to the list - should I ?
> >
> > I've just atta
On 11/22/2007 10:11 AM, Ulrike Grömping wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> yes, I am talking about a new version (currently called 1.99, to be
made 2.0 on release). I don't think I should attach the file in a note
to the list - should I ?
>
> I've just attached the tar-file for you. Please let me know
On 11/22/2007 9:26 AM, Ulrike Grömping wrote:
> I suppose I should add that this is under Windows (XP).
> Regards, Ulrike
>
>
> Ulrike Grömping wrote:
>>
>> Dear R-developers,
>>
>> I'm experiencing a problem with having an example run under R 2.6.1 RC
>> (downloaded and installed today, r43513
I suppose I should add that this is under Windows (XP).
Regards, Ulrike
Ulrike Grömping wrote:
>
> Dear R-developers,
>
> I'm experiencing a problem with having an example run under R 2.6.1 RC
> (downloaded and installed today, r43513), which does not occur on R 2.6.0:
> The new version of pac
Dear R-developers,
I'm experiencing a problem with having an example run under R 2.6.1 RC
(downloaded and installed today, r43513), which does not occur on R 2.6.0:
The new version of package relaimpo does list package survey under
"Depends", and an example directly (i.e. not only from within a f
