On 23 January 2015 at 05:55, Hadley Wickham wrote:
| I'd strongly second the notion of using github. The biggest advantage
| is that others can easily contribute changes through pull requests
| which lifts much of the burden from your shoulders.
That's "The Theory".
"The Practice" for eight week
Willem,
thanks for volunteering!
Sorry if this doesn't end up in the thread. Tobias Verbeke forwarded
that e-mail to me, because he thought I would be interested in
maintaining the Programming Tools CTV. I wasn't subscribed to R-devel
yet, but I would indeed like to volunteer to maintain the
I'd strongly second the notion of using github. The biggest advantage
is that others can easily contribute changes through pull requests
which lifts much of the burden from your shoulders.
Hadley
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Luca Braglia wrote:
> Hi Willem
>
> thanks for volounteering.
>
> T
Dear Willem
I maintain the MetaAnalysis CTV.
I have found it quite practicable to do this without special tools. I
use an editor for the XML. I use CRANberries to catch updates and I
usually email people to check I have understood a new package. People
also kindly email me occasionally with n
Dear Willem,
Personally, I use the R-forge project for the distribution CTV :
https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/ctv/
It’s an alternative option to github.
Regards, Christophe
---
Christophe Dutang
LMM, UdM, Le Mans, France
web: http://dutangc.free.fr
Le
... BTW you should install the ctv package and read the vignette at
first :) ...
2015-01-23 12:49 GMT+01:00 Luca Braglia :
> Hi Willem
>
> thanks for volounteering.
>
> To the best of my knowledge (regarding the machinery side), if you're
> planning to use github (and maybe even if you don't) you
Hi Willem
thanks for volounteering.
To the best of my knowledge (regarding the machinery side), if you're
planning to use github (and maybe even if you don't) you can "stole"
ideas from
https://github.com/ropensci/webservices
https://github.com/lbraglia/PackageDevelopmentTaskView (minor
modifica
Hi all,
Sorry if this doesn't end up in the thread.
Tobias Verbeke forwarded that e-mail to me, because he thought I would be
interested in maintaining the Programming Tools CTV.
I wasn't subscribed to R-devel yet, but I would indeed like to volunteer to
maintain the Programming Tools CTV.
It
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Achim Zeileis wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible resear
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Achim Zeileis wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
>>>
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
task view th
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
For example, roxygen2 is a tool that
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
>
>> I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
>> task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
>>
>> For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibili
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility
but I see it more as a tool for better programming. I'm about to
Hi,
this summer, after few mails on this list, i started something similar
(feeling the same need)... here is the repo
https://github.com/lbraglia/PackageDevelopmentTaskView
Currently it's quite freezed since i'm working on other projects in my
free software spare time (and likely i won't return
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Max Kuhn wrote:
> I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
> task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
>
> For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility
> but I see it more as a tool for better program
I second the motion for a Programming Tools CRAN Task View.
I would also think it could contain things like Rcpp, R6, etc.
-Greg
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Max Kuhn wrote:
>
> I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
> task view that fall into a grey area (t
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility
but I see it more as a tool for better programming. I'm about to check
in a new version of the task view
17 matches
Mail list logo
