Re: [Rd] [patch] Add support for editor function in edit.default

2014-09-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Scott Kostyshak > wrote: >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Scott Kostyshak >> wrote: >>> Regarding the following extract of ?options: >>> ‘editor’: a non-empty string, or a function that is called

Re: [Rd] [patch] Add support for editor function in edit.default

2014-09-08 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Scott Kostyshak > wrote: >> Regarding the following extract of ?options: >> ‘editor’: a non-empty string, or a function that is called with a >> file path as argument. >> >> edit.default cur

Re: [Rd] [patch] Add support for editor function in edit.default

2014-08-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Regarding the following extract of ?options: > ‘editor’: a non-empty string, or a function that is called with a > file path as argument. > > edit.default currently calls the function with three arguments: name, > file, and t

[Rd] [patch] Add support for editor function in edit.default

2014-05-20 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Regarding the following extract of ?options: ‘editor’: a non-empty string, or a function that is called with a file path as argument. edit.default currently calls the function with three arguments: name, file, and title. For example, running the following vimCmd <- 'vim -c "set ft=