ginal Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Martin Maechler
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:46 AM
> To: charles.an...@statisticalengineering.com
> Cc: 'Santosh'; r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subjec
There are many other useful extensions one might imagine along these lines.
For instance, we could have an argument for stopping the 'which'
calculation at the first result (or the first N results), which is
often useful (cf. any).
But I think it would be much cleaner for things like this to be d
Martin Maechler wrote:
"CAPE" == Charles Annis, P E
on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:46:10 -0400 writes:
>> ?is.na
>> x <- c(NA, 3, 4, 5, NA)
>> which(is.na(x))
CAPE> [1] 1 5
well, of course.
But note that which.na(.) could be implemented to be
faster (because needin
> "CAPE" == Charles Annis, P E
> on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:46:10 -0400 writes:
>> ?is.na
>> x <- c(NA, 3, 4, 5, NA)
>> which(is.na(x))
CAPE> [1] 1 5
well, of course.
But note that which.na(.) could be implemented to be
faster (because needing much less memory) than th
